Loved it bhargav bhai...But there was nothing new in this article for me as we have already discussed this for hours in my podcast as well as on WhatsApp Call.
I just hope these rented atheist will understand your point and correct themselves.But most of them are politically motivated atheist,they just want to s*it on religion specially Hinduism...They have no interest in these philosophical discussions.
Frankly speaking,
I was able to understand those weird symbols and truth tables just because of that formal logic book you sent me few months ago.
Thanks for mentoring and guiding me and yeah keep writing these articles...Intezaar rahega next article ka
This is really a great post in understanding the true whataboutery the dumbs have adopted. The use of logical signs is one good way of making it make sense tbh. Expecting more from you !
Why target a certain name from a specific religion for a dumb example? Now don't say that was unintentional. I don't have any issue but this just shows how much "logical" or "philosophical" of a person you are. You can mock anyone but anyone mocks back then he is just an irrational dork. Hypocrisy?
So, basically, PD Magnus is targeting Christianity when he uses the same example with the name "John"? Huh, quite an appeal to motive. Maybe, you should start reading the books that I've mentioned above. Secondly, if I want to target a religion, I can do that explicitly (and I'm gonna do it) using a logical structure.
Nope, that's not the same thing and we know that. The name you choose is very specific and used by trolls from your religion to mock the minority community of that country. The example is also not random, again it is used by trolls to mock the supposed beliefs of that community (which they actually don't hold) by taking its literal translation into account. And yes, you do spew hate against some non regional religions openly and that deep hatred of yours is spilled in this post too. Also, your post better highlights who should be reading the books more.
Wait, how does mocking someone go on to show the person who is mocking is not logical or philosophical?
Oh, you must be one of those Reddit atheists or secularists who gets triggered every time somebody criticises Islam or Christianity. Don't worry buddy. Get some help. The political atheists described in this article refer to you.
Well, you can't claim/portray to have deep insight in a field and yet act like a total jack@$$ teenager when someone doesn't fall in your line.
No, I am not. Furthermore, that's not any criticism that's just plain old troll and if I am not wrong that's actually what redditors are infamous for. I don't need any help cause I am no brown-noser👃
Loved it bhargav bhai...But there was nothing new in this article for me as we have already discussed this for hours in my podcast as well as on WhatsApp Call.
I just hope these rented atheist will understand your point and correct themselves.But most of them are politically motivated atheist,they just want to s*it on religion specially Hinduism...They have no interest in these philosophical discussions.
Frankly speaking,
I was able to understand those weird symbols and truth tables just because of that formal logic book you sent me few months ago.
Thanks for mentoring and guiding me and yeah keep writing these articles...Intezaar rahega next article ka
Thank you so much, Ravi! I appreciate your feedback. And yes, part B would be published soon!
Hello! What's the name of that logic book? Please!
Forallx: Introduction to formal logic. PD Magnus et. al. If you click the citation it takes you the website from where you can download it.
This is really a great post in understanding the true whataboutery the dumbs have adopted. The use of logical signs is one good way of making it make sense tbh. Expecting more from you !
amazing post. complex ideas put very simply
Why target a certain name from a specific religion for a dumb example? Now don't say that was unintentional. I don't have any issue but this just shows how much "logical" or "philosophical" of a person you are. You can mock anyone but anyone mocks back then he is just an irrational dork. Hypocrisy?
So, basically, PD Magnus is targeting Christianity when he uses the same example with the name "John"? Huh, quite an appeal to motive. Maybe, you should start reading the books that I've mentioned above. Secondly, if I want to target a religion, I can do that explicitly (and I'm gonna do it) using a logical structure.
Nope, that's not the same thing and we know that. The name you choose is very specific and used by trolls from your religion to mock the minority community of that country. The example is also not random, again it is used by trolls to mock the supposed beliefs of that community (which they actually don't hold) by taking its literal translation into account. And yes, you do spew hate against some non regional religions openly and that deep hatred of yours is spilled in this post too. Also, your post better highlights who should be reading the books more.
It does highlight who should be reading them more, and that's you. So read it, get educated.
Haha....We get it 👏
I don't think so; if you actually got it, you'd have provided a critique instead of committing appeal to motive fallacy.
Wait, how does mocking someone go on to show the person who is mocking is not logical or philosophical?
Oh, you must be one of those Reddit atheists or secularists who gets triggered every time somebody criticises Islam or Christianity. Don't worry buddy. Get some help. The political atheists described in this article refer to you.
Well, you can't claim/portray to have deep insight in a field and yet act like a total jack@$$ teenager when someone doesn't fall in your line.
No, I am not. Furthermore, that's not any criticism that's just plain old troll and if I am not wrong that's actually what redditors are infamous for. I don't need any help cause I am no brown-noser👃